tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7690685905207226001.post3018306671512359101..comments2023-06-15T05:25:55.046-04:00Comments on Ordinary Working Grammarian: Gender Balance in a Syntax I SyllabusChris Collinshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17999530032394474839noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7690685905207226001.post-73343048337623540162020-08-09T13:13:40.708-04:002020-08-09T13:13:40.708-04:00I think you could address two lacunae in one move ...I think you could address two lacunae in one move by having a module on agreement (currently missing), and having as the readings Bejar's 2003 dissertation and Deal's NELS 45 proceedings paper:<br /><br />Béjar, Susana. 2003. Phi-syntax: a theory of agreement. Doctoral dissertation, Toronto, ON: University of Toronto.<br /><br />Deal, Amy Rose. 2015. Interaction and satisfaction in phi-agreement. In Proceedings of the 45th meeting of the North East Linguistic Society (NELS 45), eds. Thuy Bui & Deniz Özyıldız, vol. 1, Amherst, MA: GLSA, 179–192.<br /><br />Since this would have to come at the expense of something, schedule-wise, I would be remiss if I didn't suggest something to cut out to make room for this agreement module. Here too, I think one can strike a joint blow in favor of gender balance as well as useful scholarship, by eliminating the "Problems of Projection" readings and the attendant session :-)<br /><br />Omerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06157677977442589563noreply@blogger.com