Friday, November 21, 2025

My Trip to Google (November 21, 2025)

These are photos from my fieldwork expedition to the Google office space in lower Manhattan (near 8th avenue and 15th street). I was invited by an old NYU student (a syntactician naturally), who now works as a hotshot programmer for Google. I accepted with the goal of finding out as much as I could about the Google office space and culture. I was not disappointed. Below is the huge neon sign you see when you first enters the building. The only way to enter the building is by invitation, and even then you need a government sponsored ID. Without it, they will turn you away.

 


We headed right to the cafeteria. They had a wide range of standard NYC food, including Indian food, middle eastern, a barbecue, a salad bar. I am working with a low carb diet now, but I had no problem finding tasty dishes. The best part -- it is totally free. You just take your food, and eat. Below is a picture of me and Ross (the syntactician/progammer) eating. I of course used this opportunity to pitch my idea for a Noam Chomsky Award to Ross, hoping he could figure out how to make Google sponsor it.

Afterwards, we headed to a terrance on the same floor to look out over the city. Beautiful views!




Below is yours truly enjoying the sunshine.



Apparently in the photo below, one can see Bobst library, just to the left of the white building. 


Then we went to the top floor to look out over the city.


I did some fieldwork to find the workers at play.


And to top it all off, there was a huge Lego wall, where you could go and grab some Legos to play with.





Thursday, November 13, 2025

Inversion in Russian, Smuggling, and Leapfrogging (Storment and Collins)

Abstract: Russian is a canonically-SVO language with relatively free word order (Bailyn 1995). As others have shown, OVS word orders for transitive clauses involve A-movement of the preverbal object (Bailyn 2004; Pereltsvaig 2021, a.o), while the fronted object of OSV sentences lacks A-properties and is derived via Ā-movement. In this squib, we account for these facts under a Minimalist analysis of inversion as smuggling (Collins 2024; Storment 2025b), showing that smuggling accounts for the OVS word order and the A-properties of the fronted object. We contrast the smuggling analysis with an alternative, leapfrogging, which we show fails to account for the OVS-OSV asymmetries regarding A-movement, as well as introducing a general theoretical issue of unrestrictiveness.

Inversion in Russian, Smuggling, and Leapfrogging

Inversion in Russian, Smuggling, and Leapfrogging (Lingbuzz)




Monday, November 10, 2025

Verb Movement (Class Exercise -- Graduate Syntax I)

Syntax I Fall 2025

Classroom Exercise: Verb Movement in French

Objective: To learn how to draw tree diagrams of well-known examples from French in order to discuss theoretical issues involving head movement.

Instructions: Students take 20-25 minutes to draw the trees below. Students are not allowed to use any outside sources in drawing these trees. 

Topics to Discuss: head adjunction, Mirror Principle, HMC, Extension Condition, c-command.

Source: Pollock, Jean-Yves. 1989. Verb Movement, Universal Grammar, and the Structure of

IP. Linguistic Inquiry 20.3: 365-424.

1. Jean (n’)     aime     pas   Marie.

Jean (NEG) likes   NEG Marie

‘Jean doesn’t like Marie.’

2. Aime-t-il        Marie?

like-t-3M.SG Marie

‘Does he like Marie?’

3. a. Jean embrasse souvent  Marie.

Jean kisses       often   Marie

‘Jean often kisses Marie.’

b. *Jean souvent embrasse Marie.

c. Jean a souvent embrassé Marie. (ChatGPT)

Jean has often  kissed     Marie.

“Jean has often kissed Marie.’

4. a. Mes amis  aiment tous Marie

my friends like    all    Marie

‘My friends all like Marie.’

b. *Mes amis tous aiment Marie

5. a. Pierre n      ’a       rien      mangé

Pierre NEG have nothing eaten

‘Pierre has eaten nothing.’

b. *Pierre n’a         mangé    rien

6. a. Pierre ne   mange       rien

Pierre NEG eats nothing

‘Pierre doesn’t eat anything.’

b. *Pierre ne rien mange

7. a. Ne    pas    regarder la   télévision… (subject infinitival clause)

NEG NEG watch    the television…

‘Not to watch TV…’

b. *Ne regarder pas la télévision…

Tuesday, November 4, 2025

Class Exercises for Graduate Level Syntax (pedagogy)

In my attempt to get away from lecture based learning, and get more into hands-on fieldwork based learning, I have written a few class exercises for graduate level Syntax and II. These exercises are meant to be done by the students during the class period. The students then show their work, and the class discusses the results.

I will add more exercises as I write them up. I will also be happy to post exercises written by other people.

Syntax I

Practice Tree Drawing

Unergatives versus Unaccusatives

Nominalizations and Implicit Arguments

Antisymmetry and Cinque 2005

Head Movement

Syntax II

A-Movement versus A'-Movement

Friday, October 31, 2025

Cinque 2005 (class exercise -- graduate Syntax I)

 Syntax I                 Fall 2025

Classroom Exercise: Cinque 2005

1. Read Cinque 2005:

Cinque, Guglielmo 2005. Deriving Greenberg’s Universal 20 and Its Exceptions. Linguistic Inquiry 36, 315-332.

2. Choose a language other than English for which you will investigate DP structure. You can use your own native language. If needed, you can do some fieldwork and consult a native speaker. Alternatively, you can find the relevant information in a good grammar. We have nine students in the class, there should be nine different languages chosen for the assignment. I want to see an interesting range of languages!

3. Provide some examples illustrating the order of the following elements (all appearing in the same phrase): Demonstrative (Dem), Numeral (Num), Adjective (Adj) and Noun (N). If possible, your set of examples should include both grammatical and ungrammatical orderings. Examples from English include: ‘those three new cars’, or ‘these four brown dogs’.

4. State the generalization governing the order of these elements in the DP. If there is flexibility in word order, describe the possible orders (and what triggers those alternative orders).

5. Using the theory in Cinque 2005, give the tree diagram for one of the examples that you found in (3). You will present your tree diagram in class on the white board on Wednesday, November 5, 2025.

6. Write up your results, including a discussion of any issues that came up in steps (4) and (5). The length of the write-up, including the tree diagram, should be about three pages double-spaced. It is due before class on Monday, November 10, 2025.

Note: Your language may involve classifiers, case markers and/or other elements internal to a DP in addition to Dem, Num, Adj and N.  Such additional elements are not the focus of this exercise, so just do your best to incorporate them into the tree.

Note: For part (3), your examples should be glossed and translated. Each example should have three lines (the example, the gloss and the translation, in that order). You should follow the Leipzig glossing conventions (which are standard for the field of linguistics): http://www.eva.mpg.de/lingua/resources/glossing-rules.php. If you follow the Leipzig glossing rules, it will make it much easier for us to understand your data.




Wednesday, October 29, 2025

Guidelines for Final Papers in Syntax I (Graduate)

The students have written their proposals, and have gotten lots of feedback. Now it is time to write a final paper. These are very basic guidelines (the nuts and bolts) to help students write a research paper for Syntax I.

1. The paper should be around 15-20 pages (double-spaced) long, including references, trees and footnotes.

2. The paper is due on the last day of class, Wednesday, December 10, 2025.

3. Use Linguistic Inquiry style sheet (online). In other words, references, citations, margins and example numbering should all conform to the LI style sheet. No creative formatting allowed.

4. Your paper should be double-spaced, 12-point font, preferably Times New Roman. 

5. Avoid using footnotes. If some point is important, work it into the text. If it is not important, drop it. But if you must use footnotes, they should also be 12-point font (otherwise, I cannot read them when I print the papers off). 

6. Pages must be numbered, otherwise it is very hard to comment on the paper.

7. Your paper should have a title, author, date, institution (NYU).

8. It should also have an abstract and keywords. Writing an abstract is an excellent way to clear up your thinking on a complex topic, and to distill it into its most important points. Make it look as close as possible to a real paper that you would find posted on Lingbuzz.

9. For all non-English examples, use Leipzig glossing conventions:

https://www.eva.mpg.de/lingua/resources/glossing-rules.php

10. In particular, all examples in languages other than English should consist of three lines:

Line 1: Sentence in target language

Line 2: English gloss

Line 3: English translation

11. Your paper should include a paragraph on your source of data. It should be possible for me to know where every single sentence in your paper came from. You might say: The data in this paper are the native speaker acceptability judgments of the author.

12. Write your paper for an audience that has had basic syntax (e.g., a one semester graduate introduction to syntax, or a yearlong basic undergraduate course). All concepts, terminology and principles you use should be carefully defined. For example, if you invoke Principle A of the binding theory, you need to give the definition in the paper (and the source of the definition). Don’t just assume that we all know it.

13. The basic syntactic framework for your paper should be Principles and Parameters/Minimalist Syntax. Of course, it is possible to discuss innovations and additions to this theoretical framework.

14. Please try to write a syntax paper. You will have plenty of opportunity in other classes to write phonology, phonetics, semantics, pragmatics, sociolinguistic or morphology papers. For example, if your analysis crucially involves the phrase ‘post-syntactic’, then you are on the wrong track. In this class, I want to see you do some syntax!

15. Your paper should include at least one syntax tree diagram, more if needed. 

16.  If you give examples illustrating your data, make sure to give minimal pairs whenever possible (whenever the data is available and a minimal pair is relevant). For example, if you claim that a sentence is unacceptable because of X, and you give an example of the unacceptable sentence, then also give the minimal pair where X is not violated.

17. Is your argumentation sound? Does C follow from A and B, or is it just wishful thinking? No handwaving allowed.

18. Golden Rule: Do not assume we can read your mind! Explain your argumentation to us. Explain your background assumptions to us. Explain individual sentences to us. Make it cognitively easy on the reader to read your paper.

Tuesday, October 28, 2025

Leonard Bloomfield Book Award Finalist (links)


Leonard Bloomfield Book Award Finalist
The Bloomfield Book Award Committee congratulates Chris Collins as an award finalist on his book Principles of argument structure, published by MIT Press in 2024.


The LSA Bloomfield Book Award Committee is pleased to announce two finalists for the award. Congratulations to Chris Collins for his work, Principles of Argument Structure: A Merge-Based Approach and to George Aaron Broadwell for his work, The Timucua Language: A Text-Based Reference Grammar!