Everybody knows somebody who is
terrible at e-mail. Here is a system of e-mail grades for your colleagues,
students and friends. At the end of each year (December 31), just send them
their grade, and the description of what the grades mean. I guarantee that you
will see a notable improvement in their e-mail performance the following year.
The grades are calculated by adding the positive (+1) and negatives (-1). The maximum score is +5, and the minimum score is -5.
A (Excellent)
4 and above
B (Very Good)
3 and above
C(Mediocre)
2 and above
D (Unacceptable)
1 and above
F (Failing)
0 or below
Positives (each worth
+1):
The person responds to urgent messages on the
same day.
The person responds to all messages, even if
just to say that they have received your e-mail message and will respond later
(specifying the date when they will respond).
If the person is on vacation, you receive an
automatic reply telling you when they will return.
The person writes thoughtful and helpful responses
to your queries. Their responses are well-written and easy to read.
The person follows the Goldilocks Principle: Their
messages are neither too short nor too long. They are just right.
Negatives (each worth
-1):
When the person writes you an e-mail message,
the header often does not accurately reflect the content of the e-mail message.
So your inbox is flooded with dozens of messages having inscrutable headers
like “Today” or “Hello”.
The person sometimes presses “Reply All” when
they mean to press “Reply” revealing awkward bits of information to large
groups of people.
The person will sometimes forward your messages
(which may contain personal, sensitive or confidential information) to other people, without asking you
ahead of time.
The person uses e-mail to the exclusion of all
other forms of communication (phone or talking in person), even if their office
is close to yours and even when the topic is clearly not suitable for e-mail
(e.g., it is a complex or sensitive topic requiring face-to-face
communication).
The person has two or three e-mail addresses,
leading to uncertainty about which one they use most and which one to reply to.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.