Proposal for Volume on
Smuggling
Editors:
Adriana Belletti, Chris Collins
Publisher: Oxford University Press
Since the beginning of generative
grammar, displacement has been identified as a
characteristic property of human languages: a constituent (e.g., a DP) is
interpreted only in part in the position in which it is pronounced, in part it
is interpreted in the position where it is first merged (and assigned its theta-role
in the case of a DP). Displacement occurs in different guises, as A, A' and
head-movement.
Sometimes, movement
can affect a chunk of clause structure that is attracted by some feature to a
higher position. From the landing site of the large chunk, movement can further
affect a constituent contained in it. This is the process referred to as smuggling (a term coined by Collins
2005). Looked at in this way, smuggling is a kind of movement interaction,
where one movement operation precedes another of a certain type. Other kinds of
movement interactions include remnant movement, successive cyclic movement,
crossing paths nested paths.
As shown
in Collins 2005, an effect of smuggling is the possibility of circumventing
locality constraints on movement (e.g., Relativized Minimality). He argues that
in the case of the passive, a verbal chunk containing the object is moved over
the in-situ external argument, circumventing a violation of locality.
Cases
of smuggling have already been
proposed for the derivation of passive, double object constructions and
causatives, all of which involve A-movement. However, there is no principled
reason why the process should only make reference to A-movement, giving rise to
the expectation that we will find cases of smuggling
also in the domain of A’-movement and head movement. For example, suppose that
movement of a wh-phrase with a feature [+wh] to the matrix Spec CP position is
blocked by some constraint. Is it possible for the movement to proceed via some
other non-blocked derivation?
This volume will explore the
following questions:
a. What
is the full range of smuggling phenomena, including A’-movement, A-movement
and head-movement?
b. Smuggling derivations sometimes involve
violations of Freezing, a constraint that prohibits extraction from a moved
constituent. What is the status of the Freezing constraint in UG?
c. What other strategies are available for
circumventing locality constraints? How does smuggling fit into a general
theory of circumventing locality constraints?
d. How
are smuggling derivations acquired by children?
e. What
is the status of smuggling in a bare phrase structure grammar in which the the labeling
algorithm (Chomsky 2013) operates?
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.