Here is a series of five papers I have written recently concerning negation, quantifiers and negating quantifiers. They are all syntax/semantics interface papers, with a substantial semantic component. The constant theme throughout is the application of the basic framework of Collins and Postal 2014 to various phenomena.
Wednesday, June 21, 2023
Tuesday, March 7, 2023
Internet Searches as a Tool in Syntactic Research (third version)
Friday, March 3, 2023
Implicit Arguments at WCCFL 41 (2023): Abstracts
The following abstracts concerning implicit arguments have been accepted to WCCFL 41:
Tuesday, February 28, 2023
On the Syntactic Status of Implicit Arguments in UG: Greek as a Case Study (Accepted WCCFL 41 2023 Abstract)
The abstract below is a joint effort by our team, including (in alphabetical order):
Niko Angelopoulos, Chris Collins, Dimitris Michelioudakis and Arhonto Terzi.
On the Syntactic Status of Implicit Arguments: Greek as a Case Study
Friday, February 24, 2023
The Distribution of Particles in Quotative Inversion (Collins 2003)
In this paper , I revisit the analysis of Quotative Inversion (QI) presented in Collins (1997) (see also Collins and Branigan (1997), and see Doeleman 1998 and Suñer 2000 on QI in other languages). Based on the distribution of particles in QI, I will show that the […V Subj…] word order found in QI (quotative inversion) is the result of VP movement to a position c-commanding the in-situ Subj. The distribution of particles provides direct evidence against the verb movement analysis of QI given in Collins 1997.
The Distribution of Particles in Quotative Inversion
Saturday, January 28, 2023
The Use of the Internet as a Natural Language Corpus in Syntactic Research
Motivation
Collins and Postal (2012, 2014) contain a large amount of data obtained from Internet searches. Similarly, such data is cited extensively in chapters 2 and 3 from my forthcoming monograph “Principles of Argument Structure: A Merge Based Approach”.
Sunday, September 18, 2022
Responding to Reviewers: 10 Pieces of Advice
It is often necessary to respond to reviewer comments. For example, if you submit a paper, and the editor’s decision is “revise and resubmit” or “accept with major revisions”, you will be required to respond to reviewer comments.
I have responded to reviewer comments hundreds of times throughout my career, not only for papers and books, but also grant applications.
This blog post lists some pieces of advice that you might find useful.
Wednesday, July 1, 2020
Workshop Announcement: Syntactic Approaches to Morphology
Three Monographs to Write
Friday, May 15, 2020
The Beginning of Syntax (Version 3)
Saturday, November 16, 2019
Papers that I would love to write (but do not have time for right now)
Thursday, October 31, 2019
Introduction (Belletti and Collins 2019)
Belletti and Collins 2019
Thursday, October 24, 2019
Thought as Syntax
Monday, October 21, 2019
A Smuggling Approach to the Adjunct/Argument Asymmetry
Monday, July 22, 2019
Outer negation of universal quantifier phrases
Outer negation of universal quantifier phrases
Thursday, June 13, 2019
Description of Ewe Repository
Wednesday, May 9, 2018
Summary of Research 2017-2018
Friday, May 4, 2018
Proposal for Volume on Smuggling
Friday, September 29, 2017
Scalar Modification of Quantifier Phrases
https://ling.auf.net/lingbuzz/003682